logo/link to home page contact us |  site map |  comments  
image of the charles

 
home
calendar
projects
master plan
get involved
river stories  
water quality quiz  
comments  
newsletter  
parklands  
river portraits  
press
about us  
subscribe to e-newsletter
join the CRC
 
CRC address & phone  


Advocacy: MDC

April 2003

Governor Romney, in an effort to cut down on duplication of services and improve park management, has proposed to create a Department of Parks and Recreation, a new agency for parks and recreational facilities management. The new department would consist of a Division of Urban Parks and Recreation (the old MDC) and the Division of State Parks and Recreation (the old DEM). The new Department would also contain a bureau of Metro Parks.

This reorganization structure is intended to create a more efficient agency, more uniform policies and performance standards for park maintenance, and an expanded role for citizen participation while cutting down on overlapping services.

While the maintenance of the parkways will be undertaken by the new Public Works in the Transportation Department, ownership and funding control over the parkways will remain with the Department of Parks and Recreation. The Conservancy has been very involved with the restructuring plans, and is working hard to ensure that the parkways along the Charles River will be managed as parklands, and not as highways.

If you are interested in reading the letter that the coalition of groups has written see below:

April, 2003

Doug Foy, Chief of Commonwealth Development
Office of the Governor
State House, Room 360
Boston, MA 02133

Ellen Roy Herzfelder,
Secretary of Environmental Affairs
251 Causeway Street, 9th floor
Boston, MA 02114

Dear Chief Foy and Secretary Herzfelder:

We are writing to express our general support for the creation of a Division of Conservation and Recreation within the Department of Environment, as proposed in Article 87 reorganization legislation of April, 2003. We support the concept of a unified park and forest management agency, with a Bureau of Parks and Recreation that is divided into a number of regions, because we believe it will offer improved management of the Metropolitan Park System, as well as the resources currently under the control of the Department of Environmental Management. The proposal would meet our coalition's goals for the Metropolitan Parks System: keeping the park system intact; improving management of parks and facilities; providing for transparency and accountability; institutionalizing public participation; and local management based on geographic decentralization.

There are several specific sections of the draft legislation that we feel need modification.

Stewardship Council

We are strongly supportive of the proposed Stewardship Council, which would act as an independent oversight body within DCR. Such a body will provide much-needed accountability and trust, and will strengthen an open decision-making process in statewide park management. The legislative language creating this Council should be clear and specific about the Council's duties, makeup, and administration. We believe the legislative language should be modified as follows:

  • The Council should be given enforceable oversight of park management plans, capital planning and policy development;

  • The Council should be given advisory review of budgets and fees;

  • Nominations for the 11 seats on the Council should be made to the Governor from NGOs with relevant expertise and regional distribution;

  • The Chair should be self-selected from among the Council;

  • The Chair should have a 2-term limit;

  • The Council should be provided with staff.

Parkways

The intent of the legislation, as described by administration staff, is to keep management responsibilities for the Parkways with DCR in order to maintain the Parkways as part of the Park System, not part of the state highway system. The legislation should be modified to reflect this. In particular:

  • The legislation should specify that the capital and maintenance funds for Parkways, and the control of those funds, remains with DCR;

  • Consideration should be given to putting management and maintenance responsibilities for all Parkways in the state into this Bureau, with funding under control of DCR.

We welcome the opportunity to continue working with you and the many partners you have brought to the table, as well as with the legislature, to move forward and improve the management of our state's great parks systems. We look forward to final Article 87 legislation that we can wholeheartedly support.

Sincerely,

Robert L. Zimmerman, Jr., Charles River Watershed Association
Renata von Tscharner, Charles River Conservancy
John Pike, Conservation Law Foundation
Nancy Goodman, Environmental League of Massachusetts
Linda Cox and Jeryl Oristaglio, The Esplanade Association
Kathy Abbott, The Island Alliance
John J. Clarke, Massachusetts Audubon
Wesley T. Ward, The Trustees of Reservations

METROPOLITAN PARKLANDS COALITION:

  • Charles River Watershed Association
  • Charles River Conservancy
  • Conservation Law Foundation
  • Environmental League Of Massachusetts
  • The Esplanade Association
  • The Island Alliance
  • Mass Audubon
  • The Trustees Of Reservations

 

Email this page to a friend

 

top calendar | projects | river basin | get involved | press | river portraits | home